docs: add pusht imf swanlab design

This commit is contained in:
Logic
2026-03-26 16:56:22 +08:00
parent 08c1950c6d
commit ba6ede9425

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
# PushT Image DiT iMF + SwanLab Design
## Goal
Migrate the PushT image DiT experiment path from W&B to SwanLab online logging, suppress simulation video logging, then add an iMeanFlow-based one-step transformer policy for PushT image experiments and run a controlled architecture sweep over embedding width and depth using `test_mean_score` as the primary metric.
## Context
- The implementation baseline is `main`.
- The experiment path is limited to the PushT image transformer workflow; unrelated workspaces and runners should remain unchanged.
- Environment management must use the repo-local `uv` workflow.
- The trusted remote machine alias `5880` refers to `droid-system-product-name` (`droid@100.73.14.65`) and can run two GPU jobs in parallel.
## Architecture Overview
The work is split into two verified phases:
1. **Logging migration phase**
- Keep the existing PushT image DiT training behavior intact.
- Replace W&B usage with SwanLab in the transformer hybrid workspace used by PushT image DiT experiments.
- Preserve local `logs.json.txt` output.
- Ensure rollout metrics such as `test_mean_score` and per-seed rewards are still logged.
- Disable simulation video logging at both the config and runner/logging boundary.
2. **iMF migration phase**
- Keep the original diffusion-based transformer image policy available on `main`.
- Add a parallel iMF-specific model/policy/config path rather than overwriting the baseline diffusion policy.
- Reuse the existing observation encoder and training workspace where possible.
- Replace diffusion training with the iMeanFlow training objective.
- Use one-step inference for validation/rollout in the iMF path.
## Logging Design
### Scope
Only the PushT image DiT experiment chain is changed:
- `train_diffusion_transformer_hybrid_workspace.py`
- `pusht_image_runner.py`
- the new/updated PushT image transformer configs
### Behavior
- SwanLab runs in `online` mode.
- Logged values are scalar metrics only, e.g.:
- `train_loss`
- `val_loss`
- `train_action_mse_error`
- `test_mean_score`
- aggregate rollout metrics and optional per-seed scalar rewards
- No simulation videos are uploaded or wrapped as logging objects.
- Local JSON logging remains enabled for auditability and remote-job fallback debugging.
### Operational safeguards
- Default PushT experiment configs set `task.env_runner.n_test_vis=0` and `task.env_runner.n_train_vis=0`.
- The PushT image runner will not emit video objects into `log_data`, preventing accidental uploads even if visualization counts are later changed.
- SwanLab credentials are provided through the environment at runtime, not committed into the repo.
## iMF Model Design
### Baseline reuse
The iMF path reuses:
- the existing image observation encoder
- the existing action/observation normalization path
- the existing training workspace skeleton
- the existing PushT image dataset and env runner
### New files
- `diffusion_policy/model/diffusion/imf_transformer_for_diffusion.py`
- `diffusion_policy/policy/imf_transformer_hybrid_image_policy.py`
- `image_pusht_diffusion_policy_dit_imf.yaml`
### Model structure
The iMF transformer mirrors the current transformer policy structure closely enough to reuse known-good conditioning patterns, but predicts two heads:
- `u`: average velocity field
- `v`: instantaneous velocity field
Inputs remain conditioned on encoded observations and action trajectory tokens.
## iMF Training Objective
For a normalized action trajectory `x`:
1. sample `t, r`
2. sample Gaussian noise `e`
3. form `z_t = (1 - t) * x + t * e`
4. predict instantaneous velocity `v = fn(z_t, t, t)` or equivalently the models `v` head at time `t`
5. compute `u` and `du/dt` with JVP using tangent `(v, 0, 1)` over `(z, r, t)`
6. form compound velocity:
- `V = u + (t - r) * stopgrad(du_dt)`
7. train against target average velocity:
- `target = e - x`
8. optimize the iMF loss on unmasked action tokens, with any auxiliary `v`-head loss kept only if it helps preserve stability
The implementation should prefer `torch.func.jvp` and keep a safe fallback path if the local Torch stack needs it.
## iMF Inference Design
Inference uses a single step starting from noise:
- initialize `z_1 ~ N(0, I)`
- set `t = 1.0`, `r = 0.0`
- predict `u(z_1, t, r, cond)`
- produce the action sample with one update:
- `x_hat = z_1 - (t - r) * u`
This matches the time direction in the reference iMeanFlow sampling logic.
## Testing Strategy
### Phase 1: logging migration smoke test
- use the repo-local `uv` environment
- run a debug/smoke PushT image DiT training job on a single GPU with:
- `training.debug=true`
- `dataloader.num_workers=0`
- `val_dataloader.num_workers=0`
- `task.env_runner.n_envs=1`
- `task.env_runner.n_test_vis=0`
- `task.env_runner.n_train_vis=0`
- verify:
- SwanLab initializes successfully
- `logs.json.txt` is populated
- rollout metrics still include `test_mean_score`
- no video logging is attempted
### Phase 2: iMF smoke test
- run an equivalent debug PushT image iMF job
- verify:
- forward/backward passes succeed
- JVP path executes on the local Torch version
- one-step inference returns correctly shaped actions
- rollout produces scalar metrics including `test_mean_score`
## Branch and Commit Strategy
1. start from a `main`-based worktree branch
2. commit the SwanLab/no-video migration after smoke verification
3. continue with the iMF implementation
4. once iMF smoke tests pass, create/preserve a dedicated feature branch for the experiment code and push it to Gitea
## Experiment Plan
After the iMF path is smoke-tested:
- run a 3x3 grid over:
- `n_emb ∈ {128, 256, 384}`
- `n_layer ∈ {6, 12, 18}`
- keep the rest of the setup fixed
- run each experiment for 300 epochs
- primary comparison metric: `test_mean_score`
## Resource Allocation
Three concurrent runs should be scheduled continuously until the matrix is complete:
- local machine: 1 GPU
- `5880`: 2 GPUs
Each run uses the same uv-managed environment and the same pushed branch so the code path is consistent across hosts.
## Risks and Mitigations
- **Torch JVP compatibility risk**: provide a fallback JVP implementation and smoke-test immediately.
- **Logging regression risk**: keep local JSON logging and verify scalar rollout metrics before moving to iMF.
- **Video/logging side effects**: disable visualizations in config and filter video objects out of runner logs.
- **Cross-host drift**: push the verified branch to Gitea before launching the experiment matrix on multiple machines.